<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ban People Who Forget to Use Their Real Name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/</link>
	<description>&#34;Simplify and Automate Your Life with Email Autoresponder Mailing Lists&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:27:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sensei J. Richard Kirkham B.Sc.</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3979</link>
		<dc:creator>Sensei J. Richard Kirkham B.Sc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3979</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re really getting on the verge of ethics by replacing something that someone else wrote with your own text Jeff

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're really getting on the verge of ethics by replacing something that someone else wrote with your own text Jeff</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bode</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3977</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3977</guid>
		<description>Hey Robert

Although it may be more time consuming...

why not remove their link and place another name in place of what they wrote? or remove the name altogether...

Personality sells if you show who you are people are much more likely to trust you, as you know trust is very important!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Robert</p>
<p>Although it may be more time consuming...</p>
<p>why not remove their link and place another name in place of what they wrote? or remove the name altogether...</p>
<p>Personality sells if you show who you are people are much more likely to trust you, as you know trust is very important!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Marie Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3897</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Marie Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3897</guid>
		<description>My opinion is, it does depend on the comment. If the comment isn&#039;t spammy and is adding value to the blog, then why not let it stay?

Annie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion is, it does depend on the comment. If the comment isn't spammy and is adding value to the blog, then why not let it stay?</p>
<p>Annie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>Picture the person building an Online Business to escape 9-5, the last thing they want is to be discovered by their employers and work mates. So I think it should be fine to not use your real name i.e. use a Pen Name.

Potentially damaging keywords appearing on your blog could be a problem though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picture the person building an Online Business to escape 9-5, the last thing they want is to be discovered by their employers and work mates. So I think it should be fine to not use your real name i.e. use a Pen Name.</p>
<p>Potentially damaging keywords appearing on your blog could be a problem though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3883</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3883</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert,

YOU&#039;re the King of your blog !
YOU&#039;ve to set the rules upfront: choose what you thinks is right and then put that rules above the comment section (like for example Tim Ferriss did on his blog).

What I do on my blog is to tollerate &quot;Name @ My Site&quot; or &quot;Name - My Site&quot; if the commenter really brings in value, otherwise I delete the whole comment or I edit the commenters name deleting the site name.

I don&#039;t tollerate when they put in only &quot;My Site&quot; and they get deleted in any case.

ciao
alexander</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>YOU're the King of your blog !<br />
YOU've to set the rules upfront: choose what you thinks is right and then put that rules above the comment section (like for example Tim Ferriss did on his blog).</p>
<p>What I do on my blog is to tollerate "Name @ My Site" or "Name - My Site" if the commenter really brings in value, otherwise I delete the whole comment or I edit the commenters name deleting the site name.</p>
<p>I don't tollerate when they put in only "My Site" and they get deleted in any case.</p>
<p>ciao<br />
alexander</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Drain</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3882</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Drain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3882</guid>
		<description>What I often do is to use my name, but follow it with the site name. Blog comments are usually worthless for Google juice anyway since Wordpress has rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; enabled by default.

If the commment is using your site for Google juice and isn&#039;t contributing any value, it might as well be spam. Ditch it. If it&#039;s a good comment, perhaps they&#039;ve earned their googlebomb, not that it&#039;s worth much with rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; enabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I often do is to use my name, but follow it with the site name. Blog comments are usually worthless for Google juice anyway since WordPress has rel="nofollow" enabled by default.</p>
<p>If the commment is using your site for Google juice and isn't contributing any value, it might as well be spam. Ditch it. If it's a good comment, perhaps they've earned their googlebomb, not that it's worth much with rel="nofollow" enabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Nada</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3879</link>
		<dc:creator>John Nada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3879</guid>
		<description>OOOh, controversy...I LOVE it!

I think like others have said, that there&#039;s a right way and a wrong way to go about things. I don&#039;t really focus on comment posts/SEO as a major traffic magnet so when I post, it&#039;s to actually join the conversation. 

I&#039;ve never just out &amp; out posted with a blatant spam link back to my site, but I only just recently added my picture. I&#039;ve always used my name. So for me it was just a small technical obstacle with gravatars.

I don&#039;t think banning them off the bat is right, but a warning to the offender and then banning after repeated offenses is absolutely just.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOOh, controversy...I LOVE it!</p>
<p>I think like others have said, that there's a right way and a wrong way to go about things. I don't really focus on comment posts/SEO as a major traffic magnet so when I post, it's to actually join the conversation. </p>
<p>I've never just out &amp; out posted with a blatant spam link back to my site, but I only just recently added my picture. I've always used my name. So for me it was just a small technical obstacle with gravatars.</p>
<p>I don't think banning them off the bat is right, but a warning to the offender and then banning after repeated offenses is absolutely just.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miker</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3878</link>
		<dc:creator>miker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3878</guid>
		<description>What kills a skunk is the publicity it gives itself.
Abraham Lincoln

My .02 cents...

MikeR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kills a skunk is the publicity it gives itself.<br />
Abraham Lincoln</p>
<p>My .02 cents...</p>
<p>MikeR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sensei J. Richard Kirkham B.Sc.</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3876</link>
		<dc:creator>Sensei J. Richard Kirkham B.Sc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3876</guid>
		<description>Love ya Bryan

No one ever got noticed doing the exact thing everyone else does and there&#039;s always someone ready to scream witch, oops I mean spam, at the top of his or her lungs after clocking out of the hourly paid job that he or she hates

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love ya Bryan</p>
<p>No one ever got noticed doing the exact thing everyone else does and there's always someone ready to scream witch, oops I mean spam, at the top of his or her lungs after clocking out of the hourly paid job that he or she hates</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Local Marketing consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3875</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Local Marketing consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3875</guid>
		<description>After reading some of the comments i can say how it would go down on MY blog.

I would look at those who dont understand anything about Business, who dont understand anything about promotion, who dont understand anything about traffic and backlinks. especially the ones who actually RESENT or despise those that DO have a Business and Do embrace SEO and promotion.
i would actually ban THOSE as the losers that do not actually add any value.
Regardless of how good intentioned or authentically posted , if they exhibit the kind of disdain for promotion that is needed to be one of the minority successful businesses, they dont really belong adding their negative views on a blog whose topic and relavency is &quot;how to be successful online.
Jason Fladlien sent me a somewhat promotional, part inspirational email the other day that speaks of the &quot;97% crowd&quot; and descibes those who just DON&#039;t get it.
 the People who actually self destructively resent and bring down Positive, proven and useful business building techniques bring down those who really Want to succeed.
 He said &quot;habits are more caught than taught. You usually pick up the habits of those that you most closely associate with. &quot; 97% of people won&#039;t get it and shouldnt be allowed to poison the enthusiastic empowering entrepreneur

Now, I am not advocating spam in any way.

If the comment is just a spammy &#039;Atta boy great post, I agree&quot; I ban it regardless of the url or keywords of the poster.

 IF the reader automatically resents and dismisses those others whose posts  prefer SEO or keywords over Name, while still adding resources, solutions and empowering education then I keep the entrepreneur and Ban the loser /hater. 

 &quot;dont do that! I hate that! you Business promoters SUCK!&quot; does not add any value but a post thats intended to provide a resource, be a solution while also being keyword savvy is a welcome addition of content and deserves a little &quot;keywordluv plugin&quot; link love for the value its added.

thanks and take care
Bryan Bliss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading some of the comments i can say how it would go down on MY blog.</p>
<p>I would look at those who dont understand anything about Business, who dont understand anything about promotion, who dont understand anything about traffic and backlinks. especially the ones who actually RESENT or despise those that DO have a Business and Do embrace SEO and promotion.<br />
i would actually ban THOSE as the losers that do not actually add any value.<br />
Regardless of how good intentioned or authentically posted , if they exhibit the kind of disdain for promotion that is needed to be one of the minority successful businesses, they dont really belong adding their negative views on a blog whose topic and relavency is "how to be successful online.<br />
Jason Fladlien sent me a somewhat promotional, part inspirational email the other day that speaks of the "97% crowd" and descibes those who just DON't get it.<br />
 the People who actually self destructively resent and bring down Positive, proven and useful business building techniques bring down those who really Want to succeed.<br />
 He said "habits are more caught than taught. You usually pick up the habits of those that you most closely associate with. " 97% of people won't get it and shouldnt be allowed to poison the enthusiastic empowering entrepreneur</p>
<p>Now, I am not advocating spam in any way.</p>
<p>If the comment is just a spammy 'Atta boy great post, I agree" I ban it regardless of the url or keywords of the poster.</p>
<p> IF the reader automatically resents and dismisses those others whose posts  prefer SEO or keywords over Name, while still adding resources, solutions and empowering education then I keep the entrepreneur and Ban the loser /hater. </p>
<p> "dont do that! I hate that! you Business promoters SUCK!" does not add any value but a post thats intended to provide a resource, be a solution while also being keyword savvy is a welcome addition of content and deserves a little "keywordluv plugin" link love for the value its added.</p>
<p>thanks and take care<br />
Bryan Bliss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
