<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ban People Who Forget to Use Their Real Name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/</link>
	<description>&#34;Simplify and Automate Your Life With Email Autoresponder Mailing Lists&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth Kuhn</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-7568</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabeth Kuhn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-7568</guid>
		<description>Just noticed that Andy made a really good point here -- about some people needing to protect themselves from being found out about their employers, who may frown on their &quot;outside&quot; activities.

So yes, there are some alternative ways to identify oneself that are legit.

Just thinking of folks like the Barefoot Executive, and of course the Rich Jerk, etc.

So if it&#039;s a name like that, that&#039;d be okay.

A name like &quot;Viagra RX&quot; or anything x-rated or otherwise clearly spammy on the other hand... Not so good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed that Andy made a really good point here -- about some people needing to protect themselves from being found out about their employers, who may frown on their "outside" activities.</p>
<p>So yes, there are some alternative ways to identify oneself that are legit.</p>
<p>Just thinking of folks like the Barefoot Executive, and of course the Rich Jerk, etc.</p>
<p>So if it's a name like that, that'd be okay.</p>
<p>A name like "Viagra RX" or anything x-rated or otherwise clearly spammy on the other hand... Not so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth Kuhn</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-7567</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabeth Kuhn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-7567</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert and all,

First of all, I agree with Ron!  It&#039;s obviously not about &quot;forgetting&quot; to include a name.

Personally, I rarely run into a problem where it&#039;s tough to decide what to do.

Most people who leave product names and such actually also leave clearly spun and/or worthless posts, so I simply don&#039;t approve them.

I have on occasion removed a link when someone posted something relevant but I didn&#039;t like where the link was taking things...

Mostly, though, I leave them intact if I approve the comments.

Thanks for raising this interesting issue!

Elisabeth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert and all,</p>
<p>First of all, I agree with Ron!  It's obviously not about "forgetting" to include a name.</p>
<p>Personally, I rarely run into a problem where it's tough to decide what to do.</p>
<p>Most people who leave product names and such actually also leave clearly spun and/or worthless posts, so I simply don't approve them.</p>
<p>I have on occasion removed a link when someone posted something relevant but I didn't like where the link was taking things...</p>
<p>Mostly, though, I leave them intact if I approve the comments.</p>
<p>Thanks for raising this interesting issue!</p>
<p>Elisabeth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sensei J. Richard Kirkham B.Sc.</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3979</link>
		<dc:creator>Sensei J. Richard Kirkham B.Sc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3979</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re really getting on the verge of ethics by replacing something that someone else wrote with your own text Jeff

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're really getting on the verge of ethics by replacing something that someone else wrote with your own text Jeff</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bode</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3977</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3977</guid>
		<description>Hey Robert

Although it may be more time consuming...

why not remove their link and place another name in place of what they wrote? or remove the name altogether...

Personality sells if you show who you are people are much more likely to trust you, as you know trust is very important!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Robert</p>
<p>Although it may be more time consuming...</p>
<p>why not remove their link and place another name in place of what they wrote? or remove the name altogether...</p>
<p>Personality sells if you show who you are people are much more likely to trust you, as you know trust is very important!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Marie Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3897</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Marie Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3897</guid>
		<description>My opinion is, it does depend on the comment. If the comment isn&#039;t spammy and is adding value to the blog, then why not let it stay?

Annie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion is, it does depend on the comment. If the comment isn't spammy and is adding value to the blog, then why not let it stay?</p>
<p>Annie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>Picture the person building an Online Business to escape 9-5, the last thing they want is to be discovered by their employers and work mates. So I think it should be fine to not use your real name i.e. use a Pen Name.

Potentially damaging keywords appearing on your blog could be a problem though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picture the person building an Online Business to escape 9-5, the last thing they want is to be discovered by their employers and work mates. So I think it should be fine to not use your real name i.e. use a Pen Name.</p>
<p>Potentially damaging keywords appearing on your blog could be a problem though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3883</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3883</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert,

YOU&#039;re the King of your blog !
YOU&#039;ve to set the rules upfront: choose what you thinks is right and then put that rules above the comment section (like for example Tim Ferriss did on his blog).

What I do on my blog is to tollerate &quot;Name @ My Site&quot; or &quot;Name - My Site&quot; if the commenter really brings in value, otherwise I delete the whole comment or I edit the commenters name deleting the site name.

I don&#039;t tollerate when they put in only &quot;My Site&quot; and they get deleted in any case.

ciao
alexander</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>YOU're the King of your blog !<br />
YOU've to set the rules upfront: choose what you thinks is right and then put that rules above the comment section (like for example Tim Ferriss did on his blog).</p>
<p>What I do on my blog is to tollerate "Name @ My Site" or "Name - My Site" if the commenter really brings in value, otherwise I delete the whole comment or I edit the commenters name deleting the site name.</p>
<p>I don't tollerate when they put in only "My Site" and they get deleted in any case.</p>
<p>ciao<br />
alexander</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Drain</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3882</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Drain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3882</guid>
		<description>What I often do is to use my name, but follow it with the site name. Blog comments are usually worthless for Google juice anyway since Wordpress has rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; enabled by default.

If the commment is using your site for Google juice and isn&#039;t contributing any value, it might as well be spam. Ditch it. If it&#039;s a good comment, perhaps they&#039;ve earned their googlebomb, not that it&#039;s worth much with rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; enabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I often do is to use my name, but follow it with the site name. Blog comments are usually worthless for Google juice anyway since WordPress has rel="nofollow" enabled by default.</p>
<p>If the commment is using your site for Google juice and isn't contributing any value, it might as well be spam. Ditch it. If it's a good comment, perhaps they've earned their googlebomb, not that it's worth much with rel="nofollow" enabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Nada</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3879</link>
		<dc:creator>John Nada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3879</guid>
		<description>OOOh, controversy...I LOVE it!

I think like others have said, that there&#039;s a right way and a wrong way to go about things. I don&#039;t really focus on comment posts/SEO as a major traffic magnet so when I post, it&#039;s to actually join the conversation. 

I&#039;ve never just out &amp; out posted with a blatant spam link back to my site, but I only just recently added my picture. I&#039;ve always used my name. So for me it was just a small technical obstacle with gravatars.

I don&#039;t think banning them off the bat is right, but a warning to the offender and then banning after repeated offenses is absolutely just.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOOh, controversy...I LOVE it!</p>
<p>I think like others have said, that there's a right way and a wrong way to go about things. I don't really focus on comment posts/SEO as a major traffic magnet so when I post, it's to actually join the conversation. </p>
<p>I've never just out &amp; out posted with a blatant spam link back to my site, but I only just recently added my picture. I've always used my name. So for me it was just a small technical obstacle with gravatars.</p>
<p>I don't think banning them off the bat is right, but a warning to the offender and then banning after repeated offenses is absolutely just.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miker</title>
		<link>http://www.robertplank.com/real-name/#comment-3878</link>
		<dc:creator>miker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertplank.com/?p=738#comment-3878</guid>
		<description>What kills a skunk is the publicity it gives itself.
Abraham Lincoln

My .02 cents...

MikeR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kills a skunk is the publicity it gives itself.<br />
Abraham Lincoln</p>
<p>My .02 cents...</p>
<p>MikeR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

